SHOULD AN ADVERSE EVENT OCCUR IN ANY ONTARIO HOSPITAL, THE CITIZENS OF ONTARIO WILL BE ENSURED IT WILL BE COVERED UP BY ALL OF THOSE SEEN BELOW:

THE HOSPITAL --under jurisdiction of Liberal Minister of Health

THE CHIEF CORONER'S OFFICE--appointed by Liberal majority government and --under jurisdiction of Liberal Minister of Corrections

THE DEATH INVESTIGATIVE OVERSIGHT COUNCIL--appointed by Liberal majority government and --under jurisdiction of Liberal Minister of Corrections

THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO

THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS APPEAL AND REVIEW BOARD--appointed by Liberal majority government --under jurisdiction of Liberal Minister of Health

THE ONTARIO OMBUDSMAN--appointed by Liberal majority government

THE ONTARIO PATIENT OMBUDSMAN--appointed by Liberal majority government

THE ONTARIO PROVINCIAL POLICE--under jurisdiction of Liberal Minister of Corrections

THE INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW DIRECTOR--appointed by Liberal majority government and --under jurisdiction of Liberal Minister of Corrections

THE LIBERAL MINISTER OF HEALTH

THE LIBERAL MINISTER OF CORRECTIONS

THE LIBERAL PROVINCIAL PREMIER

WHEN IT COMES RIGHT DOWN TO IT, THE PRESENT LIBERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD HAVE COME CLEAN TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF ONTARIO.

ALL OF THE ABOVE ARE IN "BREACH OF TRUST" AS THEY COVER EACH OTHERS' ASSES

A FATHER’S FAILURE

Without a doubt; a Conspiracy exists,
Self-protecting Officials; such hypocrites!

If you were a MPP’s daughter; it would cause a fit,
Because you’re mine; they don’t give a shit!

For years we have yearned for justice,
The lack of moral integrity merely disgusts us!

Government institutions that won’t expose,
The Medical negligence concealed by those!

Medical Immunity granted; regardless of guilt,
Preserving Ontario Health Care’s patchwork quilt!

So many individuals paid through our taxes,
Failing us all; what a bunch of asses:

Premier of Ontario --Premier Wynne, Premier McGuinty,

Ontario Minsters of Health --Dr. E. Hoskins, D. Matthews, Rick Bartolucci

Ontario Ministers of Corrections --Yasir Naqvi, Madeleine Meilleur

Ontario Members of Provincial Parliament --majority of them from 2006 to the present

CPSO -- Angela Bates Manager Committee Support Area Investigations and Resolutions, Sandra Keough Investigator

HPARB --Chair Janice Vauthier, Past Chair Linda Lamoureux, Lori Coleman Registrar, Third Appeal Chair Tom Kelly, Members Stephen Jovanoviorc and Brenda Petryna

Ontario Ombudsman --Paul Dube Ombudsman, A Marin-Ombudsman, Investigator Lorraine Boucher- Investigator, Fran Cappe-Investigator,

Humber River Hospital --CEO B. Collins, past CEO Rueben Devlin,

Ontario Chief Coroner’s Office --Dr. D. Huyer, Dr. A. McCallum, Dr. A. Lauwers

DIOC --Joseph C.M. James (Chair), Emily Musing (Vice-Chair), John Pearson (Vice-Chair), William (Bill) McLean, David Williams, Dorothy Cynthia (Cindy) Prince, Denise St-Jean, Fiona Smaill, Lidia Narozniak, Lori Marshall, Lucille Perreault, William (Bill) J Shearing, Michael Pollanen, Fiona Foster Manager of DIOC

Ontario Patient Ombudsman --Christine Elliott, Investigator Marie Claire Muamba

Ontario Provincial Police --Commissioner J.V.N. (Vince) Hawkes, Inspector Bradley McCallum

OIPRD -- Director Gerry McNeilly

*****************************************************************************
Terra Dawn Kilby
"An Angel In Our Lives"
April 22/78 to July 21/06

Linked 2612 Connections/Followers
https://www.linkedin.com/…/humber-river-hospital-still-cove…

2,817

http://thepatientfactor.com/…/the-unholy-alliance-between-…/

DO YOU SMELL SOMETHING ROTTING WITHIN ONTARIO:
https://1drv.ms/w/s!ApBprmlxiUUnhHumD25kXQnNQ4f_

http://www.torontosun.com/…/why-did-woman-die-after-routine…

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/18/secret-medical-cautions

https://www.linkedin.com/…/ontario-patient-ombudsmans-offic…

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/another-failure-arnold-kilby…

https://www.linkedin.com/…/death-investigation-oversight-co…

https://www.linkedin.com/…/terra-dawn-conspiracy-arnold-kil…

https://www.linkedin.com/…/help-bring-true-transparency-acc…

https://www.linkedin.com/…/breach-trust-chief-coroners-offi…

https://www.linkedin.com/…/hparb-merely-mirage-valid-avenue…

https://www.linkedin.com/…/p-dube-ontario-ombudsman-arnold-…

https://www.linkedin.com/…/att-ontario-provincial-police-co…

https://www.linkedin.com/…/truth-kept-hidden-abusing-legisl…

READ ALL OF MY POSTS AS I ATTEMPTED TO BRING TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY TO ONTARIO.

SCROLL DOWN FOR POSTS
--Look on right side under "Blog Archive" (oldest to newest)

*********************

College of Physicians and Surgeons - Stories of Failure

What is especially interesting in this recent Star (last week Feb/2016)article is the following:

“We are not a public organization. . . Our accountability is to our members,” said the College’s executive director, Dr. Francine Lemire" CPSO

ONTARIO OMBUDSMAN'S OFFICE FAILS TO PROTECT CITIZENS FROM HPARB'S LACK OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND ADHERING TO THE PRINCIPALS OF NATURAL JUSTICE.

Mr Shanoff, (Toronto Sun Columnist) I don't know if you have done an article on the Ombudsman's Office, but you may wish to take this on as they are not questioning the contradictions. We already know the CPSO is corrupt and HPARB from your article where you stated "it looks like HPARB just threw up their hands and said we give up"

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/11/why-did-woman-die-after-routine-surgery

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/18/secret-medical-cautions

But for the Ombudsman's Office to swallow such garbage leaves the citizens of Ontario with no where to go.

Coalition For Physician and Surgeon Oversight is a group who has been harmed or had a loved one taken through negligence by a doctor/surgeon.


****************************************************

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LFqWujTEVA&feature=youtu.be

Terra Dawn Kilby --- A Father's Memories
An Angel In Our Lives, Terra Dawn Kilby November 2014

A tribute to the life of my daughter who died due to the negligence of a surgeon at Humber River Regional Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Covered up by Humber River Regional Hospital, the CPSO, HPARB, Chief Coroner's Office of Ontario, the DIOC, Ontario's Ombudsman and the entire Provincial Liberal Party!


TERRA DAWN KILBY April 22, 1978 - July 21, 2006. College’s Decision “The routine use of antibiotics prior to bowel surgery is an important aspect of care that was NEGLECTED by Dr. Klein in this case.”…
00:35:48

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMof3T--zUY&feature=youtu.be


******************************************************
THE PATIENT FACTOR

http://thepatientfactor.com/canadian-health-care-stories/the-unholy-alliance-between-organized-medicine-and-government-a-fathers-quest-for-truth-and-justice-in-public-health-care/

HPARB's Decisions Kilby vs Laz Klein.
First Decision:
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onhparb/doc/2010/2010canlii44390/2010canlii44390.html
Second Decision:

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onhparb/doc/2012/2012canlii39837/2012canlii39837.html
Third Decision:
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onhparb/doc/2013/2013canlii46625/2013canlii46625.html

The Letter I Sent to the Chief Coroner's Office Outlining My Numerous Concerns
Coroner's Comments.doc

Death Investigative Oversight Council's Decision

2 years after my initial request and after both Chief Coroner and Deputy Chief Coroner left the OCC.
DIOC Decision Aug 2013.doc


*********************************************************
The Chief Coroner's Office, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board, the Death Investigative Oversight Council, the Liberal government and Ms Deb Matthews and Premier Wynne apparently agree that it is perfectly within the accepted Standard of Care to:
--have open abdominal surgery without the mandatory antibiotic prophylaxis

--having not had the above, accepted that there was no need for antibiotics when the abdominal incision was oozing purulent liquid and was so infected that all staples were removed

--when test results showed "many gram negative bacilli", still it was quite acceptable to provide no antibiotics

ONTARIO CITIZENS----
And the College/HPARB totally ignored Dr. Andrew McCallum's letter to the College when he was Eastern Ontario Coroner. In it he states that infection was a contributing factor in Terra's death.
One must also wonder how on earth the Chief Coroner's death investigation failed to note the lack of antibiotics plus other issues contained within the hospital records and yet I have numerous pieces of correspondence from both Dr. Lauwers and Dr. McCallum stating they saw no issues with respect to the Standard of Care???
HOW DO YOU SPELL COVER-UP???



************************************
THE OMBUDSMAN'S OFFICE has allowed the College and HPARB to establish the above as precedence for future complaints/appeals made to both of them.
VERY DANGEROUS TO ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN WITH REGARD TO PATIENT SAFETY AND CARE WITHIN OUR HOSPITALS.


********************************************************





http://thepatientfactor.com/canadian-health-care-stories/the-unholy-alliance-between-organized-medicine-and-government-a-fathers-quest-for-truth-and-justice-in-public-health-care/

https://plus.google.com/100940639342885447409/posts/YwvYaMn7eTw

http://www.yelp.ca/user_details?userid=BslEQAF9s6rUav3VSPqcWQ



**************************************************
Gan Reporter to appear this week before Tuesday, July 21, 2015
Terra Dawn Kilby
“An Angel In Our Lives”
April 22, 1978 – July 21, 2006


Tears still appear when we think of you.
Visits to your grave site we often do.
Loving memories convey serenity too!

Our precious daughter, Terra Dawn;
It’s been nine years since you’ve been gone.
Within our hearts you still belong!

July Twenty-first is a time of sorrow.
Additional years, I wish we could borrow.
Maybe then, we’d not feel hollow!

Today, messages guided to heaven above.
Channeled to you on the wings of a dove.
Expressing our heartfelt, everlasting love!


LOVE MOM, DAD AND BRANDY

Sunday, 24 June 2012

No Accountability or Transparency in Ontario--Dr. Bert Lauwers/Dr. Andrew McCallum/Dr. Laz Klein---Part 7

 A PRIMER ON THE LAW OF DEFAMATION IN ONTARIO
"Defamation is comprised of two subcategories between libel (libel refers to written defamatory statements)and slander(broadcasting of spoken defamatory words)

Proving a Claim in Libel and/or Slander
"the statement must be false!"

Defences to Actions in Libel and Slander
TRUTH--
"The first defence is the defence of truth. The defence can be made that the statement was truthful and therefore there was nothing false about the statement, meaning therefore, that the statement was not defamatory."


FAIR COMMENT--

"The second defence to an allegation of libelous statement is that the statements made were made as a fair comment. The defence of fair comment would be considered by the Court in situations where, by looking at the statement made, the facts and the situation, a conclusion can be made that the statements made were in actuality a fair commentary on the situation at hand and that the comments were fair and were not malicious."

QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE--
"The defence of qualified privilege arises normally in situations where the individual publishing these statements will escape any liability if it can be proven that the public good could be furthered in open debate. 

******************************************************************************

HPARB's Decision 

Very disappointing, is all I can say.
The truth will be covered up at all levels.

SO, the DIOC will use this decision to eliminate my complaint against the Chief Coroner's Office. There is no way within Ontario that justice can be achieved by an ordinary citizen. All the so called ethical and just institutions the governments proudly boast of, are merely a figure head to be use to conceal the truth from the citizens of Ontario

I should note by carefully reading the decision by HPARB, that they did not consider any of the information that I provided and presented at the meeting. You will notice they only comment and accept whatever the College committee and their independent medical advisor states as fact.  No factual and relevant material is required to back up their opinions. Sorry, their opinions are treated as absolute truth!

If they stated that the Earth was flat --- then HBARB would agree
If they stated Terra was not female---- then HPARB would agree.

It is a shame that all the work and contacts, medical surgeons, I made outside of Canada was considered absolutely irrelevant.

They will only accept a Ontario surgeon's comments.

Now, HPARB does find fault with regard to the administering of pre operative antibiotics. This is only because the College and their own medical adviser stated that this was neglected and that it is a standard practice. This contradicts the College and the adviser when they state the pre and post operative care was ok.

So, they sent it back. All the College has to do now is get a Ontario surgeon to state that this is not the standard practise and HPARB will be satisfied. EVEN THOUGH, I HAVE PROVEN BY MY CONTACTS OUTSIDE OF CANADA (Hong Kong, Britain, USA, Europe and South America.) THE IMPORTANCE OF ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS AND THAT IT IS A STANDARD OF CARE.
So, what ever the College and their experts state will not be questioned by a HPARB panel regardless of expert opinion outside of Canada.

So, basically citizens of Ontario, the medical profession is untouchable!!!!


Excerpts From Their Decision:

The second point that remains is of the greatest concern to the Board. That is so because the Record includes conflicting information concerning the standard of care concerning the use of preoperative antibiotics.

The routine use of antibiotics prior to bowel surgery is an important aspect of care that was neglected by [the Respondent] in this case. The Committee would suggest that [the Respondent] consider the routine use of antibiotics in such circumstances. Having said that, we do not consider this oversight to have contributed to the unfortunate outcome in this case.

This passage appears to the Board to be contradictory. Although the Committee states that the "routine use" of antibiotics prior to surgery is an "important aspect of care" that was "neglected" by the Respondent, it does no more than "suggest" that the Respondent "consider the routine use" of preoperative antibiotics for future surgery. The Committee goes on to describe the Respondent's decision not to provide antibiotics prior to the patient's surgery as an "oversight", which suggests a failure of pre-operative care, regardless of whether the failure contributed to the outcome in the patient's case.

The second question related to whether perioperative antibiotics should have been prescribed. [The IOP] stated that he found no evidence in the record that any antibiotics had been prescribed perioperatively. He staled that it is the standard of practice with bowel surgery to administer antibiotics, either orally or intravenously, approximately 2 hours prior to surgery so that the drugs are circulating before the incision is made. While it makes intuitive sense to administer antibiotics postoperatively, [the IOP] indicated that studies show it is the preoperative dosage that is most important, while postoperative dosing has been found to be "icing on the cake", [emphasis added]

According to this information, the IOP advised the Committee that the standard of practice required the administration of preoperative antibiotics. This appears inconsistent with the statement he made in his written opinion that the patient's "preoperative care, operative care and post operative care seemed appropriate". The matter is further confused, because in answer to the question: "Could this omission [of preoperative antibiotics] be a contributing factor to the defect in the anastomosis seen at autopsy?", the IOP answered "No".

The Board is left in some doubt as to the nature of the IOP's opinion and the Committee's decision concerning the Respondent's decision not to provide preoperative antibiotics. The IOP does not specify whether the standard of care to which he referred included laparoscopic surgery or open surgery, or both. Nor is it clear how, if at all, the IOP's advice, that the omission of preoperative antibiotics was not relevant to the anastomosis, relates to his more general advice on the standard of practice.

In these circumstances, it is necessary to return the matter to Committee for further consideration and clarification of its decision on this aspect of the complaint.

The Board's only remaining concern is with the question whether the Respondent met the standard of practice concerning the use of preoperative antibiotics.

The matter is being returned to the Committee solely for further consideration and clarification of this important matter.

DECISION
Pursuant to section 35(1) of the Health Professions Procedural Code, Schedule 2 to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, the Board returns the decision to the Committee and requires it to further consider and clarify its decision concerning the use of preoperative antibiotics and the standard of practice. The Committee's decision to counsel the Respondent on timely documentation of discharge summaries and to take no further action on the other aspects of the complaint is confirmed.